inicio mail me! sindicaci;ón

Pinger: Twitter for voice?

by Imran Ali

Pinger’s been around a little while now, but just rolled out across the UK in recent days. The service enables users to send up to a five-minute voicemail for the price of a local call to other mobile numbers in around twenty countries.

Such a voicemail, or ‘pinger’ is created using IVR voice prompts for usernames, number entry and the message itself; the notion of a completely voice operated mobile messaging service is an appealing one and coupled with the immediacy and asynchronism of a ‘Twitter for voice’, Pinger is theoretically very appealing. It’s probably best explained by the brief How It Works video on the Pinger site.

picture-1.pngpicture-2.png

Between Seesmic, Twitter and now Pinger - video, text and voice now collectively provide the collective capability for micro-blogging and status messaging in most of the formats that people would wnat to use (photos are missing of course and I don’t believe Seesmic is really mobile yet).

I’m not convinced that this type of asynchronous voice messaging is something that text-mad Brits will embrace or indeed whether the ethnographics of Twitter can apply to other media.

I do however find the use of voice UIs as appealing and a strong precedent. Unfortunately, the user experience of Pinger is appalling - three attempts to recognise the five letters of my name failed followed by the IVR’s inability to correctly identify the DTMF tones of the number I was trying to send to!

As such I was unable to test a service which shows promise and highlights what may come to be some emerging trends in user behaviour.

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • bodytext
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google


3 Comments »

  samira wrote @ January 30th, 2008 at 2:12 pm

WOW!

Imran why dont i know about this?

  Joe Sipher wrote @ January 30th, 2008 at 2:26 pm

Hey Imran,

Sorry you had trouble with Pinger. Our name spelling and particularly DTMF work very well generally. I suspect it was that you just had a bad connection. The fact that you had trouble with DTMF is a strong indicator of a bad connection–DTMF is a pretty proven methodology. One disadvantage of doing speech-based IVRs is that the IVR can’t say “hey we have a bad connection, can you call back” like you can with a human. Give it another shot with this in mind and tell me what happens.

Joe Sipher
Co-founder
Pinger

  Imran Ali wrote @ January 30th, 2008 at 5:17 pm

Hey Joe - thanks for tracking this…good to know founders are listening out :)

I did have a good connection, that’s why I was surprised by the DTMF failure…the numbers being recognised weren’t even close or even the same number of digits.

I’ll retry and send you some comments privately, perhaps I’ll be able to write a follow on post - btw, you can reach me at imran [at] ali [dot] name.

Your comment

Subscribe without commenting

HTML-Tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>